- Report this article
John Papazafiropoulos
John Papazafiropoulos
CEO @ Enhanced Consulting Services | Consulting, Process Improvement, Statistical Analysis, AI, Clinical Operations
Published Apr 13, 2023
+ Follow
The term "executive team" or "management team" has been used traditionally in business, but in recent times, it has become increasingly common to refer to it as the "leadership team." Although the intention behind the change may seem harmless, it is essential to understand why this terminology needs to stop being used. There are various reasons why companies should stop referring to their executive team as a leadership team.
Firstly, the term "leadership team" implies that the team's primary purpose is to lead, implying a hierarchy that is untrue leaders inspire, executives direct. This can create a sense of hierarchy within the company, which can result in employee dissatisfaction and disengagement. Many employees correctly assert that they do not choose their management as the leadership team, leading to unhappy employees and, as a result, a decrease in productivity. It also dilutes the meaning of the term Leadership.
Recommended by LinkedIn
Secondly, the term "executive team" is more accurate as it defines who the team is and what they do. In comparison, the term "leadership team" is vague and provides no actual description of the team's role. The executives are responsible for making high-level decisions and managing the overall direction of the company; therefore, they do not inspire followers but instead, they direct subordinates. They have direct responsibility for making strategic decisions that impact the entire organization but no obligation to create a leadership environment.
Thirdly, the term "leadership team" can be misleading. Many people think Leadership requires the ability to inspire and motivate others. However, executives are not required to have these skills. It is untrue that every executive has the ability to lead effectively. Companies should focus on developing leadership skills within their teams rather than assuming that those in leadership positions inherently possess those skills simply because of their position. Leadership requires followership, managers are appointed.
In conclusion, companies need to start using the term "executive team" instead of "leadership team." Companies need to focus on developing leadership skills in all employees, regardless of their title or position. By removing the hierarchy and providing opportunities for leadership development, organizations can create a workplace where all employees feel valued, empowered, and can contribute to the company's success. It is time to stop calling your executive team your leadership team and focus on developing a culture of leadership throughout the company.
Let's talk
Let's talk
540 followers
+ Subscribe
Like
Celebrate
Support
Love
Insightful
Funny
18
2 Comments
Jon Curtis
CEO and Board Member, MC3-Curtis Learning
2mo
- Report this comment
John, I disagree with your position on executive team vs leadership team. Members of the executive team have a primary responsibility to lead by communicating a vision for where the organization is headed, the goals and objectives the team is pursuing, and the important role the team will play in achieving the organization's goals and objectives. Executives must inspire the team and align team members in pursuit of goals and objectives. Your comment that executives "do not inspire followers but instead, they direct subordinates" is antiquated. It may be true that, as you say, not every executive has the ability to lead effectively. Yet as a whole, the executive team needs strong leaders who are effective communicators. This is essential to create and foster a strong culture, which is a competitive advantage. Executive team is fine as a title. Leadership is an essential element.
1Reaction 2Reactions
Steve Thomas
Senior Systems Engineer @ American Century Investments | AWS, Red Hat Satellite
1y
- Report this comment
Excellent points John. We have all seen leaders emerge that were not appointed, but, yet were widely regarded as experts in certain areas. We have also seen a few managers appointed that largely lack the traits and characteristics you would expect in a leadership role. My father started as an ensign in the Navy and obtained Lt. Commander rank before he retired. He often told me that the Chief Petty Officers, those between the officers and the enlisted, were some of the most influential and important in the Navy. They could be a great resource, or, if you ticked them off ... Defacto leadership differs from acquired leadership in several key ways. Defacto leadership arises organically, often without a formal title or appointment. It's usually earned through personal attributes such as charisma, knowledge, or experience, allowing an individual to influence others naturally. On the other hand, acquired leadership is attained through official channels, such as being appointed, elected, or promoted into a position of authority. The distinction lies primarily in the origin of the leadership role: defacto leaders emerge informally and gain trust over time, while acquired leaders are officially designated to lead.
1Reaction
See more comments
To view or add a comment, sign in
More articles by this author
No more previous content
- Navigating the AI Tech Revolution: Will Job Creation Outpace Job Elimination Jun 21, 2024
- The Business Case for Robust Consumer Protection Jun 20, 2024
- The Five Keys to Effective Communication in Business Jun 19, 2024
- The Importance of Professionalism in Initial Business Communications: A Case Study on Email Etiquette Jun 18, 2024
- The Power of Proactive Management: Why Effective Managers Ensure Teams Don't Need Rescue Jun 17, 2024
- Maintaining Professional Boundaries: Keeping Personal Issues Out of the Office Benefits Everyone Jun 14, 2024
- Seeing Beyond the Interview: Leveraging Early Insights Utilizing a 90-Day Plan Jun 13, 2024
- Ditch the Do-Not-Compete: The ROI of Investing in Your Workforce Jun 12, 2024
- The Subtle Distinction: Professionals vs. Experts Jun 11, 2024
- Restoring Professionalism and Civility in the Corporate World Jun 10, 2024
No more next content
Sign in
Stay updated on your professional world
Sign in
By clicking Continue to join or sign in, you agree to LinkedIn’s User Agreement, Privacy Policy, and Cookie Policy.
New to LinkedIn? Join now
Insights from the community
- Organizational Behavior What are some disadvantages of a laissez-faire leadership style?
- IT Operations Here's how you can spot and nurture future leaders in your IT Operations team.
- Leadership Here's how you can tailor your leadership style to meet the demands of a new industry.
- Practice Management How can you determine the best leadership style for your practice?
- Leadership Development What are some of the emerging leadership trends and theories that you should be aware of?
- Training Here's how you can adjust your leadership style to suit various situations and individuals.
- Business Development What are the best practices for scaling your leadership team as your business grows?
- Business Management How can you measure the impact of your leadership style on business performance?
- Management How can you integrate management and leadership?
Others also viewed
- Leaderless Leadership Dr. Marcus Gottschalk 5y
- The Best Practices of High Functioning Senior Teams Bridgette Theurer 1y
- Determine your Core Values and Stand by Them. The Program, LLC 2y
- Building an Excellent Leadership Team: Six Elements Niko Canner 5y
- Rebuilding Trust: The Path to Effective Leadership in a Broken Environment Mateo José Lopez, Ed.D. 12mo
- It's Time to Adapt Your Leadership to a New World of Work Susan M Barber, MBA, PCC 5y
- Leading quality people Mario Quintero 6y
- From ‘B Team’ to ‘A Team’ – FAST Marcel Wilson 9y
- Leadership Styles and Risk Tracey Swift, ARM 🔎🚩 6mo
Explore topics
- Sales
- Marketing
- Business Administration
- HR Management
- Content Management
- Engineering
- Soft Skills
- See All